Experienced education professional with 6+ years in the industry. Passionate about government exams, teaching, and knowledge-sharing. 

Academic Content Specialist

<p>Days after the conclusion of the G20 Summit in New Delhi, the world&#39;s two superpowers, the United States and China, have expressed their views on the outcome of the summit. Despite the absence of the Chinese and Russian Presidents and the lack of explicit condemnation of Russia&#39;s role in the Ukraine conflict in the joint declaration, both nations have deemed the summit a "success" and a "positive signal." This development raises questions about the implications of this global gathering and the perspectives of the major players involved.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="g 20 1" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/g 20 12.webp" style="height:278px; width:500px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<h2><strong>US Affirms Success Despite Absence of Key Leaders</strong></h2>

<p>The US Department of State&#39;s spokesperson, Matthew Miller, affirmed that the G20 Summit was a success. When questioned about the absence of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the joint declaration&#39;s stance on Russia&#39;s actions in Ukraine, Miller emphasized the importance of the summit&#39;s statement on respecting territorial integrity and sovereignty. He noted that this statement addressed the core issues of Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine, even though it did not explicitly condemn Russia&#39;s actions.</p>

<h2><strong>The G20 New Delhi Leaders&#39; Declaration: Navigating the Ukraine Conflict</strong></h2>

<p>The joint communique produced at the G20 Summit highlighted the Russia-Ukraine conflict as a central concern. While the declaration addressed the issue in detail over seven paragraphs, it refrained from labelling Russia&#39;s actions as "aggression." Instead, it used carefully crafted phrases emphasizing the importance of refraining from the threat or use of force and deeming the use or threat of nuclear weapons as inadmissible. This approach reflects a delicate diplomatic balance that avoids direct confrontation while addressing the global crisis.</p>

<h2><strong>China&#39;s Perspective: A "Positive Signal" and Support for Common Development</strong></h2>

<p>China&#39;s response to the G20 Summit was notably different. The absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping from the event did not elicit a comment from Chinese officials. Instead, China viewed the summit&#39;s outcome as a "positive signal." Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning emphasized that the declaration signaled unity among G20 member countries in addressing global challenges and economic recovery.</p>

<h2><strong>US Perspective on China&#39;s Absence</strong></h2>

<p>Regarding China&#39;s absence from the G20 Summit, Matthew Miller chose not to comment on whether President Xi should have attended. Instead, he focused on the productivity of President Biden and Secretary Blinken&#39;s direct engagement with their counterparts. Miller emphasized that the United States actively advanced its foreign policy priorities during the summit, including discussions on the war in Ukraine.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/g 20 123.webp" style="height:210px; width:400px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<p>Miller stressed that President Biden and Secretary Blinken had productive engagements at the summit, particularly regarding the Ukraine conflict. It is clear that both the US and China perceive value in participating in these high-level international gatherings, even when top leaders are absent.</p>

<h2><strong>A Broad Approach: Addressing Global Concerns Post-Pandemic</strong></h2>

<p>The G20 New Delhi Leaders&#39; Declaration attempted to address the concerns of the Global South, which had been exacerbated by the Ukraine conflict. It did so by taking a broad approach, considering economic distress resulting from the pandemic and acknowledging the differences among member nations. It did so by broadening its focus to include economic distress in the aftermath of the pandemic and recognizing differences among member countries.<br />
This inclusive approach underscores the G20&#39;s role as a forum for global cooperation and problem-solving.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="g 20 2" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/g 20 1.webp" style="height:277px; width:500px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<h2><strong>China&#39;s Constructive Role and Support for Global Development</strong></h2>

<p>China, through its spokesperson Mao Ning, expressed its commitment to a constructive role within the G20. She highlighted China&#39;s support for the concerns of developing countries and its endorsement of outcomes that promote global common development. Furthermore, China emphasized its support for solidarity and cooperation among G20 nations to address risks to the world economy and various development sectors.</p>

<h2><strong>Modi&#39;s Call for Global Trust</strong></h2>

<p>During the G20 Summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a pivotal call for bridging "global trust." This call comes at a crucial juncture in international relations, as trust among nations has been tested by various global challenges, including conflicts and the ongoing pandemic.</p>

<p>China&#39;s recognition of the diplomatic coup pulled off at the G20 Summit underscores the significance of the event. While specific details of the diplomatic coup are yet to be disclosed, it is evident that China views the summit&#39;s outcomes as a noteworthy success.</p>

<p>In the aftermath of the G20 Summit in New Delhi, China has openly acknowledged a diplomatic coup achieved during the event. This acknowledgement comes in response to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi&#39;s call to bridge global trust, an initiative that has garnered significant attention and support. In this article, we will delve into China&#39;s recognition of this diplomatic achievement and the implications it holds for international relations.</p>

<h2><strong>Implications for International Relations</strong></h2>

<p>The recognition of a diplomatic coup and support for Modi&#39;s call for global trust at the G20 Summit carry significant implications for international relations. It signals a potential shift towards greater cooperation and diplomacy on the global stage.</p>

<p>China&#39;s acknowledgement of the diplomatic coup may pave the way for stronger bilateral relations between China and India. Building trust and cooperation at international forums can spill over into bilateral relationships, fostering stability and cooperation.</p>

<h2><strong>A  Positive Signal for Multilateralism</strong></h2>

<p>The recognition of the diplomatic coup and support for global trust reflects a positive signal for multilateralism. In a world where unilateral actions have sometimes overshadowed collective efforts, this development underscores the importance of international cooperation. </p>

<p>The G20 Summit also served as a platform for addressing pressing global challenges, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict and economic recovery post-pandemic. China&#39;s recognition of the summit&#39;s achievements indicates a willingness to engage constructively in resolving these issues.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/India_G20_56976.webp" style="height:281px; width:500px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<p>The G20 Summit in New Delhi has concluded with the US and China providing their perspectives on the event. While the absence of top leaders and the delicate handling of the Ukraine conflict in the joint declaration raise questions, both nations view the summit as a success. The differing reactions underscore the complex dynamics of global diplomacy and the importance of international forums like the G20 in addressing pressing global challenges. As the world grapples with various crises, the ability of major powers to find common ground and signal unity remains crucial for global stability and prosperity.</p>


<p>Days after the conclusion of the G20 Summit in New Delhi, the world&#39;s two superpowers, the United States and China, have expressed their views on the outcome of the summit. Despite the absence of the Chinese and Russian Presidents and the lack of explicit condemnation of Russia&#39;s role in the Ukraine conflict in the joint declaration, both nations have deemed the summit a &quot;success&quot; and a &quot;positive signal.&quot; This development raises questions about the implications of this global gathering and the perspectives of the major players involved.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="g 20 1" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/g 20 12.webp" style="height:278px; width:500px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<h2><strong>US Affirms Success Despite Absence of Key Leaders</strong></h2>

<p>The US Department of State&#39;s spokesperson, Matthew Miller, affirmed that the G20 Summit was a success. When questioned about the absence of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the joint declaration&#39;s stance on Russia&#39;s actions in Ukraine, Miller emphasized the importance of the summit&#39;s statement on respecting territorial integrity and sovereignty. He noted that this statement addressed the core issues of Russia&#39;s invasion of Ukraine, even though it did not explicitly condemn Russia&#39;s actions.</p>

<h2><strong>The G20 New Delhi Leaders&#39; Declaration: Navigating the Ukraine Conflict</strong></h2>

<p>The joint communique produced at the G20 Summit highlighted the Russia-Ukraine conflict as a central concern. While the declaration addressed the issue in detail over seven paragraphs, it refrained from labelling Russia&#39;s actions as &quot;aggression.&quot; Instead, it used carefully crafted phrases emphasizing the importance of refraining from the threat or use of force and deeming the use or threat of nuclear weapons as inadmissible. This approach reflects a delicate diplomatic balance that avoids direct confrontation while addressing the global crisis.</p>

<h2><strong>China&#39;s Perspective: A &quot;Positive Signal&quot; and Support for Common Development</strong></h2>

<p>China&#39;s response to the G20 Summit was notably different. The absence of Chinese President Xi Jinping from the event did not elicit a comment from Chinese officials. Instead, China viewed the summit&#39;s outcome as a &quot;positive signal.&quot; Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning emphasized that the declaration signaled unity among G20 member countries in addressing global challenges and economic recovery.</p>

<h2><strong>US Perspective on China&#39;s Absence</strong></h2>

<p>Regarding China&#39;s absence from the G20 Summit, Matthew Miller chose not to comment on whether President Xi should have attended. Instead, he focused on the productivity of President Biden and Secretary Blinken&#39;s direct engagement with their counterparts. Miller emphasized that the United States actively advanced its foreign policy priorities during the summit, including discussions on the war in Ukraine.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/g 20 123.webp" style="height:210px; width:400px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<p>Miller stressed that President Biden and Secretary Blinken had productive engagements at the summit, particularly regarding the Ukraine conflict. It is clear that both the US and China perceive value in participating in these high-level international gatherings, even when top leaders are absent.</p>

<h2><strong>A Broad Approach: Addressing Global Concerns Post-Pandemic</strong></h2>

<p>The G20 New Delhi Leaders&#39; Declaration attempted to address the concerns of the Global South, which had been exacerbated by the Ukraine conflict. It did so by taking a broad approach, considering economic distress resulting from the pandemic and acknowledging the differences among member nations. It did so by broadening its focus to include economic distress in the aftermath of the pandemic and recognizing differences among member countries.<br />
This inclusive approach underscores the G20&#39;s role as a forum for global cooperation and problem-solving.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="g 20 2" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/g 20 1.webp" style="height:277px; width:500px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<h2><strong>China&#39;s Constructive Role and Support for Global Development</strong></h2>

<p>China, through its spokesperson Mao Ning, expressed its commitment to a constructive role within the G20. She highlighted China&#39;s support for the concerns of developing countries and its endorsement of outcomes that promote global common development. Furthermore, China emphasized its support for solidarity and cooperation among G20 nations to address risks to the world economy and various development sectors.</p>

<h2><strong>Modi&#39;s Call for Global Trust</strong></h2>

<p>During the G20 Summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a pivotal call for bridging &quot;global trust.&quot; This call comes at a crucial juncture in international relations, as trust among nations has been tested by various global challenges, including conflicts and the ongoing pandemic.</p>

<p>China&#39;s recognition of the diplomatic coup pulled off at the G20 Summit underscores the significance of the event. While specific details of the diplomatic coup are yet to be disclosed, it is evident that China views the summit&#39;s outcomes as a noteworthy success.</p>

<p>In the aftermath of the G20 Summit in New Delhi, China has openly acknowledged a diplomatic coup achieved during the event. This acknowledgement comes in response to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi&#39;s call to bridge global trust, an initiative that has garnered significant attention and support. In this article, we will delve into China&#39;s recognition of this diplomatic achievement and the implications it holds for international relations.</p>

<h2><strong>Implications for International Relations</strong></h2>

<p>The recognition of a diplomatic coup and support for Modi&#39;s call for global trust at the G20 Summit carry significant implications for international relations. It signals a potential shift towards greater cooperation and diplomacy on the global stage.</p>

<p>China&#39;s acknowledgement of the diplomatic coup may pave the way for stronger bilateral relations between China and India. Building trust and cooperation at international forums can spill over into bilateral relationships, fostering stability and cooperation.</p>

<h2><strong>A &nbsp;Positive Signal for Multilateralism</strong></h2>

<p>The recognition of the diplomatic coup and support for global trust reflects a positive signal for multilateralism. In a world where unilateral actions have sometimes overshadowed collective efforts, this development underscores the importance of international cooperation.&nbsp;</p>

<p>The G20 Summit also served as a platform for addressing pressing global challenges, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict and economic recovery post-pandemic. China&#39;s recognition of the summit&#39;s achievements indicates a willingness to engage constructively in resolving these issues.</p>

<p><img loading="lazy" alt="" src="https://study.kdcampus.live/admin/assets/uploads/ckeditor/India_G20_56976.webp" style="height:281px; width:500px" /></p>

<p>[Source: Indian Express)</p>

<p>The G20 Summit in New Delhi has concluded with the US and China providing their perspectives on the event. While the absence of top leaders and the delicate handling of the Ukraine conflict in the joint declaration raise questions, both nations view the summit as a success. The differing reactions underscore the complex dynamics of global diplomacy and the importance of international forums like the G20 in addressing pressing global challenges. As the world grapples with various crises, the ability of major powers to find common ground and signal unity remains crucial for global stability and prosperity.</p>


Since 1995, Neetu Mam is Providing Free Content for English to the Students

Best Publisher for English Content

<p>G20 Summit in Delhi<br />
&nbsp;</p>


G20 Summit in Delhi: US and China Label it a "Success" and a "Positive Signal"

G20 Summit in Delhi: US and China Label it a &quot;Success&quot; and a &quot;Positive Signal&quot;

Latest Notifications

Exam Eligibility

Exam Dates

Exam Pattern

Syllabus

Admit Card

Exam Cutoff

Answer Key

Exam Results

Daily Current Affairs

Current Affairs Quiz

Daily Editorial

Daily Vocabulary

Study Plan

Important Days

Question Paper

Previous Year PDF

English Language

Logical Reasoning

Quantitative Aptitude

General Knowledge

General Awareness

General Science

Today in History

Know Your State

Full Form

Know Your Country

Government Schemes

Know Your City

Know Your Leader

Books and Authors

question answer

Quiz

Courses

Classes

India's Silver Medal at the Maruhaba Cup and Its Broader Implications for Surfing in India

<p>No title</p>

The Commissioning of INS Arighat: Strengthening India’s Naval Prowess and Nuclear Deterrence

&lt;p&gt;No title&lt;/p&gt;

Days after the G20 Summit in Delhi, the US and China Laud 'Success' and 'Positive Signal'

G20 Summit in Delhi: US and China Label it a "Success" and a "Positive Signal"

G20 Summit FAQs

What is the significance of the G20 Summit in New Delhi?

How did the United States view the G20 Summit's outcomes?

How did China react to the G20 Summit, particularly concerning its President's absence?

What was the central focus of the G20 Leaders' Declaration regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict?

How might China's acknowledgement of a diplomatic coup at the G20 Summit impact international relations?

G20 Summit Comments:

G20 Summit RELATED ARTICLES